Originally Posted by
haxan
In reality we're just keeping up appearances (i.e. suppressing thoughts and desires, because it's the right thing to do). No harm in that, but it can be more work than it's worth, and as Indi stated, sometimes the line can get blurry. Better to just flirt and have fun w/out getting too involved and lose your footing on that slippery slope.
Again, I agree. Even the friend I mention--if he weren't such an old family friend I don't think we'd have gotten so close. I have other male 'friends' but none w/the same kind of dynamic at all. There's a boundary there that just doesn't get crossed. But the familiarity of such an old relationship and history blurs the boundary, as perhaps one would expect but it would be very awkward if this happened w/a new acquaintance and that rush of attraction hormones, etc. This is why I say that your childhood friend is not the standard, Searock. And also: beware.
Originally Posted by
smackie9
Just to add men and women perceive "relationships" differently. Women can admire a guy without any sexual attraction (friends zone), for guys it's all or nothing. The ladder theory explains it. It's guys that can't have close friendship with women without wondering if they can sleep with them or not.
I was wondering when someone was going to mention ladder theory. I agree w/this also. Again tho, is it *bad* to be friends w/someone you have an attraction to? That guy in the video I mentioned was quite blunt about his interest in that girl. She seemed in a bit of denial, but so long as he's okay w/admitting it and being fine with no sex then... okay? or not?
Second thoughts can generally be amended with judicious action; injudicious actions can seldom be recovered with second thoughts.
--Cyteen by C.J.Cherryh