The allegations about the racism are well-documented.
I know he was being accused of being a racist because he voted against giving Rosa Parks a medal. However, he has voted against giving anyone a medal, saying that Congress shouldn't use taxpayer's money to award such. He continued that if the House and Senate felt that she deserved one, he would pitch in money out of his own pocket along with his fellow Congressmen to buy her one, but he would not take money from the pockets of those he represented to do so.
I like some of his other goals, but honestly, I am very concerned about his age. The last time we had such an old guy in the White House, he started showing early signs of dementia while still in office. (Reagan was 69 at the time of ascension; Ron Paul would be 73 or more.)
He is up there in terms of age, but I have no problem casting my vote with an old fellow who might show signs of dementia than with a younger candidate who already does.
I also kind of think that the idea of using gold and silver instead of dollars is kind of funny, but I am not knowledgeable enough about economics to know why this would be a benefit.
The idea of gold and silver currency is that the metals actually hold value, while paper money does not. It used to be that the dollar was backed by gold reserves, but this is no longer the case.
Ron Paul's biggest challenge in this election is recognition. He has made slight press with his fund raising, but nowhere near the coverage of any of the other candidates. I have a feeling a lot of people will miss out simply don't know anything about him.
~Sphinx
You don't need eyes to see, you need vision. ~Faithless, Reverence.