Originally Posted by
casanddra
Socionics has been called a protoscience and is still in its infancy. In future it may very well be tested for validity. It has predictive power within intertype relations.
How do you claim predictive power without it being tested? Who cares about the future, where's the evidence NOW? Again, lets see a reference from a reputable journal. Until then, you can say what you want, but its binned with astrology, Homeopathy and other snake oils. I'm not one to sort garbage; I just throw it away.
"Homeopathy" is completely wrong analogy and has nothing to do with Socionics. Nobody gets typed on shape of their skull, common, that's absolutely ridiculous. You're just trying to smear it and throwing all the possible dirt that you've got at it, and unsuccessfully might I add.
Critical thinking and scientific method is hardly "dirt". LOL. You sound like an undergrad psych student. A bad one. No wonder so many schools refuse to call psychology a science. Anyway, why don't you spend your time on something useful. You'll note I said I'm quite prepared to change my opinion provided you can show evidence. Until then, its crap. Good luck.
Second thoughts can generally be amended with judicious action; injudicious actions can seldom be recovered with second thoughts.
--Cyteen by C.J.Cherryh