I know of people in both situations. Its not uncommon, just not spoken about.
*One day down at the pub*
"Hey Bob, I have this nasty rash on my dick wanna look?"
As for having it done "just because" I dont like that idea. If it aint broke...
I know of people in both situations. Its not uncommon, just not spoken about.
*One day down at the pub*
"Hey Bob, I have this nasty rash on my dick wanna look?"
As for having it done "just because" I dont like that idea. If it aint broke...
*MaJiK*
There are not many things I fear in life, but disappointing you is my greatest.
I love you even with your flaws... I love you because of your flaws.
having skin makes it easier for her to give a handjob.... no skin means some chaffing if it's dry.
Make more than just a donation: Volunteer your PC's idle time to fight against cancer! For more, please visit: www.grid.org or ask me how to join my cancer crunching team!
Yeah dude, circumcisions are purely cosmetic anymore, there really are no health disadvantages to having a foreskin. People just pull that cancer shit to justify why they still tear skin off baby dicks.
Hell, I remember having issues down there as a child and I'm cut. You know what it was from? Not washin' myself properly. Cut or uncut if you don't clean your dog it's gonna get sick. All a person with a foreskin has to do is simply pull the skin back to clean it, just the same with washin' your pits, all you gotta do is raise your arms, it's not surgery and it doesn't take a genius.
i like my buddy the way he is, uncut.
Look... There is a need to cut the foreskin on some people.
ITS A FACT!!! DEAL WITH IT!!
*MaJiK*
There are not many things I fear in life, but disappointing you is my greatest.
I love you even with your flaws... I love you because of your flaws.
mini696 -- Hard to argue with that. It doesn't say anything. The "fact" is that the practice of circumcision is nothing more than a Judaic tradition carried over to Christianity. Apart from that and disease, there is no "need" for it whatsoever.
Last edited by whaywardj; 21-07-05 at 08:35 AM.
Speak less. Say more.
Pretty convincing argument there...(jks) LOLOriginally Posted by mini696
I agree there is no need for circumcision.
I just want to make it clear to the people who believe there is "no medical reason" for cutting the foreskin, that they are wrong.
I'll be quite on this topic now, I've already dragged it far enough away from its intended goal.
Mick
*MaJiK*
There are not many things I fear in life, but disappointing you is my greatest.
I love you even with your flaws... I love you because of your flaws.
I'm talkin' about babies havin' part of their dick cut off just cause western society considers it a norm.Originally Posted by mini696
There's always possible medical reasons why any part of one's body should be removed.
Mini696 -- Did I read your post above correctly? Are you laughing at yourself? HOW COOL! Shit, man. That's two-thirds of winning the war of the sexes in any circumstance!
Speak less. Say more.
i love a humble soul.
He just confused me when he quoted himself.
I remember that british chick that quoted herself and started the whole "I agree with this post" posts.
I agree with this post and the one immediately prior.
Speak less. Say more.
any1 ever been made fun of for being uncut?...or cut?
Not really...
Then again, it's not often people see other people's wanks.
i find this thread humourus
those with uncut penis will suport uncut penis
and those with cut penis will suport cut penis
my friend has a penis, and he is 'uncut', and he is having a little problem now, and is too embarrased to see a doctor about it.........
.........do you think he has a major problem if i tell you what it is?