I never said that visible muscles aren't beautiful, that's a matter of personal taste. I'm just saying that if a person doesn't have visible muscles it doesn't mean they are unhealthy or unfit - especially females.
You can be normal weighted, healthy and still not have visible muscles. I'm not talking about overweight people.
Definitely hot. I saw someone give her a 3 or a 4. I know people do this out of spite and such, but that girl is no "4". I don't like numbers so much, but this girl is very pretty in my mind. Lovely face, and that smile can knock you out. Looks to have a kind spirit, I don't know, just guessing.
By the way, it is kind of disturbing, but what exactly do people consider "fat"? She can pull off a bikini rather well, looks to have nice boobs with a rather flat tummy (did people expect it to be flat when she's sitting down or something?). This girl is definitely hot in my book. She looks "real" and by that I mean natural and normal. Nothing fake. Kind of a girl next door type of look.
Thanks for the responses, and no I wouldn't post this up without anyone's approval. Maybe there is no rhyme or reason to do it, maybe it is a girl in a bad spot needing a little confidence boost, or some honesty. It could very well be a lot of things. Maybe it is someone I know, maybe it's me. That isn't important. Just looking for some opinions. Some people over analyse things.
My friends and I use the area code scale. First number is a 10 point scale of the face, second number is binary(would you **** her or not), and the third is the 10 point scale of the body. So a really good looking girl would be something like an 819 and a narsty girl would get something like 203.
This girl isn't bad but could use some work. I say 516. I was being generous with a 6 on the body, as the angles weren't so good.
As far as some people overanalyzing, you are on a website trying to figure out what the world thinks of you. Die choking on a dick.
Last edited by BackUpOrGetStng; 05-09-13 at 08:11 AM.
I like michelle so much ^_^
I would take offense to what michelle said, but then I'd have to pretend I care about michelles opinions of "us americans". Generalizations show ignorance. Nothing more.
To be clear, I love her passion and I get where she's coming from - I don't agree with the generalization :-).
I suggest she get her thyroid levels checked and possibly a work-up for Cushings, but otherwise within normal limits.
I know searock... I understand a lot of the poor perceptions of "americans" overall, but I think "we" get coined negatively as a group when it really is about individuals.
I did, and no, I did not do it out of spite. lol
She's not a pretty girl, IMO, and she's pretty thick in the hips and ass. She's got that whole ginger/pale/blotchy skin look that I don't find appealing.
I give her credit for rocking a bikini, but if I looked like that, I'd probably never go to the beach, tbh. BUT, I take fitness really, really seriously.
Way to put down Americans. We consistently pull the world's ass out of the fire, and look at the gratitude we get.
Alright I've got to ask here, and I am an adult male asking this question but what exactly is the definition of "pretty" or "sexy" to some people? I'm a guy and I look at that girl and think she's attractive. Who was it that said if they wore a bikini like that they'd never go to the beach? What? She has a great body I think. Who are you people dating/trying to look like? A barbie doll? Real attractive women look like this in my opinion. She isn't a stick figure, but she isn't fat either. Hey, I guess I'd better not go near a beach if this girl can't.