You assume I know wtf you're talking about, as if we had previously discussed your argument prior. Listen to my lips: I. do not. understand. you. because. you. have, so. far, been. incapable. of forming. a. solid. thought. So: If I didn't answer your question it is because the way you pose said question makes it incomprehensible as well as impossible to answer.
Form your question in a new thread, write so it makes sense and then I'd be able to answer you.
You are the master of irrelevant responses. Your replies to statements made by others have nothing to do with what was being said. Troll like behaviour, actually.Since the most of your responses were total BS, I won't respond to them simply because they are too irrelevant to even bother with.
Last edited by Wakeup; 09-07-11 at 07:19 AM.
“The willingness to accept responsibility for one’s own life is the source from which self-respect springs.” ~Joan Didion
You [OP] and Zuros would get along because you both think you're philosophical without forming coherent arguments for anything. You may think I'm a sophist, but you don't even explain where you're coming from half the time. And as someone who has studied philosophy extensively, I can say you're not nearly half as scientific as you profess to be. You also seem to have difficulty expressing your points. Try lending some context to them next time.
Dude, my valid arguments are not ancient history, but only a page or two back; I can understand if you are not that motivated. And, as far as I am concerned, the chicks can bring it up if they are that motivated, since I don't want to be too annoying simply for the sake of being annoying, without discovering any truth value through argumentation.
A more valid argument would include asking questions for clarification instead of resorting to the fallacy of argumentum ad hominem; would you like to try it again?
What is so difficult about any given woman simply being honest for sex in the same manner that many women complain about nice guys being honest for sex?
How about these "working" definitions for troll:
1. Not having a valid argument
2. Feeling the need to be rude because of not having a valid argument.
Maybe we can get them submitted to the Urban Dictionary. This could be fun.
This post was about what guys really think while watching porn and does it mean they arent good enough...etc. It has turned into a silly argument. It was a way for me to understand what men think and feel when watching it. This post is now a joke.
How do women complain about nice guys being honest for sex? Tell us your thoughts on that.What is so difficult about any given woman simply being honest for sex in the same manner that many women complain about nice guys being honest for sex?
Has it something to do with "normal knowledge" and how you're "entitled to it?"
“The willingness to accept responsibility for one’s own life is the source from which self-respect springs.” ~Joan Didion
Some nice guys really do use porn for goodness and not badness; in my case, i use porn to practice not judging women by the clothes they don't wear on the internet. I think it even ports to real life situations. You are welcome to call me on it whenever you are brave enough.
Women simply complain about nice guys being that honest as a form of respect toward fellow human beings, for some reason; it may not be the same reason those same women don't complain about bad boys just using them for sex.
I am "entitled" to it simply because I am willing to argue about it to discover truth value through argumentation. Or, if you prefer, I am holy and moral enough for Apollo to simply "make it known to me"; as Athena would be for you, but for your lack of true witness bearing and that form of lack of morality.
How about these "working" definitions for troll:
1. Not having a valid argument
2. Feeling the need to be rude because of not having a valid argument.
3. Not having sufficient intellectual integrity (or morals) to have a valid argument.