Good decisions come from experience. Experience comes from bad decisions.
Female and male athletes are mostly young, for obvious reasons.
As for what the media tells us, it's not an accurate description of reality. Actually it's a messed up vision of reality. If hollywood movies were an accurate description of reality, women over 40 would not exist (not as sexual beings at least) and a lot of other absurd things.
Anyway, I get that women in their twenties are considered to be more attractive since they are more fertile. But teenagers... just no. And it's still sad that you (and most men, according to you) would prefer a woman that doesn't look her age to a woman that looks her age - as would be natural.
I repeat though, in this thread I'm referring specifically to teen porn. This does include older women that look like teenagers. I think it's messed up for an adult to be turned on watching a person that looks like a kid having sex.
Last edited by searock; 03-08-13 at 05:39 AM.
A few points here, not sure if any of them have already been mentioned as I haven't read the entire thread but here it is anyway.
1) Those women aren't actually teenagers, they are acting. You might find a few 18-19 y/o women but that is as young as they get, there's a lot of 25 y/o porn stars playing pretend.
2) Porn = fantasy and fantasies are harmless (in moderation, that is)
3) Most guys are attracted to younger women. If there is a biological explanation I would say it's the fact that women begin to sexually mature in their early teenage years and are at their most fertile before the age of 25, thus that range is when they are considered to be at their most sexually desirable to the opposite sex, generally speaking. There are exceptions of course, a 42 year old woman who takes great care of herself might still be sexier than a 20-something who abuses her body with alcohol and shitty food all the time but you get the point.
Amateur teen porn involves real teenagers though.
The most fertile years are 19-26... nowhere close to 14-19.3) Most guys are attracted to younger women. If there is a biological explanation I would say it's the fact that women begin to sexually mature in their early teenage years and are at their most fertile before the age of 25, thus that range is when they are considered to be at their most sexually desirable to the opposite sex, generally speaking.
Why do you ask these question, sea? Do you want become pornstar again?
Doubt kills more dreams than failure ever will
The human race has been around a very long time. 6,000 years if you believe certain fundamentalists, or more than 50,000 years if you believe the anthropologists. Until the late 19th century, humans of either gender were considered to be adults after puberty, and often got married even before that. So our modern concept of the appropriate age of consent is very recent and very arbitrary, having no basis in biology. Having been raised in modern times, I now find the idea of having sex with a teenage girl under the age of 18 to be distasteful and unwelcome (though I felt differently about it when I myself was a teenager, and I lost my virginity at age 15). But intellectually, I understand that there is physically no significant difference between a female who is 17 and a female who is 18, and our modern insistence to the contrary is an artificial construct of Victorian society that has become widely accepted due to the global reach of the British Empire of that era. Compared to the rest of human history, the modern age of consent looks like a statistical error. Or it could reflect changing attitudes due to longer lifespans, which is all around a positive development.
Good decisions come from experience. Experience comes from bad decisions.
It's perfectly OK for cougars.
"1,2,3,4.....The highway's jammed with broken heroes on a last chance power-drive!"
"Glory days/Well, they'll pass you by/Glory days"
I am talking about our society right now. Right now, I believe it is safe to say that it's messed up to watch 14-19 year olds have sex if you yourself are much older than that.
Anyway this was not the point of the thread... I just wanted to know whether you guys thought the majority of men watch and enjoy teen porn (which, to clarify, is any kind of porn that involves persons looking like kids aged 14 to 19).
YC, do you watch teen porn? Do you prefer it to "regular" (i.e. involving adults) porn? I'm curious about you specifically because you are about my age.
Real teenagers as in 18-19 at the youngest. If directors actually shoot scenes with younger girls than that they get shut down and go to jail, as can some viewers via FBI/CIA tracking.
I have yet to hear of an instance of legal "teen porn" where the actual age is disclosed, and if you add the "legal" prefix to that then the youngest they can be is 18. Meaning they are either 18-19 at the youngest or 20-somethings playing pretend.
This really shouldn't be all that surprising, a lot of things about porn are fake.
Unless maybe 14 year olds are actually allowed to do porn where you live? That would clear up the confusion.
Those may be the most fertile years in terms of the years where the highest rates of pregnancy occur, but that statistic doesn't take into account the fact that people in that age group are more likely to actually try and get pregnant than younger women. If we take the ovarian reserve into account then you can roll back the 19 by a few years.Originally Posted by searock
Also, that wasn't the only criteria I mentioned, if you take everything into account that I said then the range rolls back significantly anyway.
Last edited by dickriculous; 03-08-13 at 06:21 AM.
I mean amateur porn... porn videos that people in their homes film themselves, using cell phones or cameras or whatever, and then put on youporn or wherever.
However I am also including in the definition (as I said) all porn videos that involve persons that look like teenagers. On the occasions in which they actually are teenagers (as in amateur porn videos), it only makes it worse.
No of course not.Unless maybe 14 year olds are actually allowed to do porn where you live?
Not really, no. Teenage pregnancies are more at risk than pregnancies in a woman's 20s or 30s, in terms of medical issues both for the mother and the child. http://www.webmd.com/baby/guide/teen-pregnancy-medical-risks-and-realitiesThose may be the most fertile years in terms of the years where the highest rates of pregnancy occur, but that statistic doesn't take into account the fact that people in that age group are more likely to actually try and get pregnant than younger women. If we take the ovarian reserve into account then you can roll back the 19 by a few years.
Last edited by searock; 03-08-13 at 06:36 AM.
Fair enough HIA :-).