Indicent breast exposure

[Illusional]

alright, so i was watching this documentary on thailand and the sex industry. the author was filming various aspects around thailand and he came across this lady boy who flashed him it's fake tits. now this is the part that gets to me. if it's alright for a man to walk around shirt less and if it's alright for FAT men to walk around shirtless with their large, and sometimes lady like breast bouncing all over the place... can it be alright for men or lady boy's to walk around topless with their enhanced breasts? what if this lady boy or tranny actually appears to be a male, yet he walks around topless? or there was also a man who got breast implants because of a bed of 100K. can he go to the beach and walk aronnd topless?? clearly he still is a male with all his male components in tact....comments....


raverboy

[HeartIsAching]

I really think the whole thing is weird. There's NOTHING indecent about breasts. They're a secondary sexual feature, and not always that. In England during the renaissance, they weren't at all sexual. Women who were of marriageable age that were single wore their clothing so cleavage was exposed, simply to advertise that they were eligible - that they were capable of feeding a baby. At that time exposed ANKLES and SHOULDERS were far more lascivious.

I further wonder why it's alright for children to witness mental, emotional and physical violence and implied violence in movies, but a bare breast is a nono... I mean really... a bare breast? I'd far rather my son look at bare breasts than someone getting shot at.