breaking up with him because of size..and...

[misombra]

hey dm can you put up that video of that naked guy getting arrested? that guys penis was way smaller than a thumb.

[Sanctuary]

The OP dumping the guy is just natural selection at work; we don't need the trait of micro penis in the gene pool.

[Perryville]

So sanctuary, what characteristic do you possess that we need less of? I think we need less pompous asses, in the "gene Pool".

[misombra]

perry are you insecure or something? wtf is your trip with this?

[Heratriumphant]

No argument there. I was replying to the idea that it is biologically beneficial for women to seek this trait...which it is not at all. In-fact it is a new age thing. It is biologically for a man better to squirt his DNA in the woman as fast as possible to get up and move quickly away from whatever predators might be coming or other men with spears. Also to as quickly as possible recover and get on top of the next potential DNA receiving machine as possible. My only issue was with his completely last line quote.

If the OPs discription is acurate, then this guy is a bad mating choice.

First a penis of that size is a real abnormality, this is a sign of faulty DNA.

Second, he came before he even got it in! If that trait is passes down you're tossing youself out of the gene pool.

Third, a man who sucks in bed is going to get less chances to impregnate a woman (we ain't going back for seconds KWIM).

All in all bad choice for a breeding partner on a purely biological level.

(p.s. I'm a woman, so you took issue with "HER last line" )

[Sanctuary]

So sanctuary, what characteristic do you possess that we need less of? I think we need less pompous asses, in the "gene Pool".

There's no douchebag gene that I know of, but to answer your question: I'm short (5'6"-5'7").

Second, he came before he even got it in!

Seriously, how can you even put up with that as a girl lol. All fun for Jack and none for Jill.

[misombra]

we don't need less short people. there's a lot of food and shelter on the ground.

[Perryville]

To shallowness, we now add pseudo-science, (DNA, Gene pools, natural selection, whatever). This post is becoming ridiculous, Bye-bye.

[Sanctuary]

To shallowness, we now add pseudo-science, (DNA, Gene pools, natural selection, whatever). This post is becoming ridiculous, Bye-bye.

Are you a creationist?

[Heratriumphant]

Perryville, for a sex god of a man you sure get uptight about women demanding satisfaction.

[misombra]

oh yeah i forgot. perry is a holy roller and here we are talking darwinism. how dare us.

[misombra]

oh and this is far from psuedo science. darwins theory has been tested and shown true over and over and over again.

much unlike religious beliefs.

[Sanctuary]

god forbid we even question religious beliefs. that's just rude.

[phys251]

Why is there even a debate about dumping this guy?

Bad sex is bad sex. Why not find another guy whose qualities are just as good except you will also enjoy the sex?

And wtf is a penis the size of a thumb? LOL

You know, more and more this thread is begging for pictures.

[Perryville]

I don't seem to be the one with the problem. I never in any of my posts mentioned religion, Darwinism, creationism, or that I believe that women should not be satisfied, sexually. If you can find any such references , let me know. People seem to be more interested in putting words in my mouth, that I didn't say, instead of addressing my legitimate questioning of shallow behavior. For the record, I am not religious, and am a confirmed believer in natural selection, in a valid scientific context. To use some kind of half-assed genetic mumblings, to justify shallow and callous behavior, speaks much more about the posters, than it does about me.