big tits

[Tone]

Give him, or any other member a few more hours / days.

LoL I was going to post something similar.

[whaywardj]

...but are there any certain tips that anyone knows about for really large breasts?...

Yeah. Don't make them angry.

[Late_vamp]

i dont really care that much about breast size , as long as there is some thats all that matter (B size and C are fine , dont think i would like D's) Oh and that they work with milking . what is more important for me is personallity wise and if not that , then the ass and curves and lets not forget the face .

1st place : Personnality ... because no matter how beautiful she is , if i dont like her personally then it will never work .

2nd Place : Face ... because thats what im going to be staring at most of the time and if im repulsed by that then its going to hard to kiss .

3rd place : that she has curves , most preferably an ass ... why curves ? because not only do i find it attractive but its also better for them to give birth than a women that has no waist .

4 th Place : Breast , i want a women but i dont want her to have back problems in the future , size A is a little too small for me , im looking for a women not a wall , size D are too big , too much cleavage and alot of "hey whatta lookin at ?!" going around . B and C are the deal .

*** this one is a MUST : it MUST be a woman with an actual pussy .i dont want no freak show .

[whaywardj]

My. How very Fellini-esque.

[alice]

My. How very Fellini-esque.

Nietzsche claimed that his genius was in his nostrils and I think that is a very excellent place for it to be.
[on Genius], A Fellini Lexicon, Edited by D Pettigrew (2003)

[whaywardj]

Nietzsche was also plagued by an imaginary gnome on his shoulder he referred to as Zarathustra. So, I wouldn't put much stock in anything he ever said.

[Late_vamp]

My. How very Fellini-esque.

i know i might sound like a tard but what does that mean ?

[alice]

Nietzsche was also plagued by an imaginary gnome on his shoulder he referred to as Zarathustra. So, I wouldn't put much stock in anything he ever said.

i think, that's exactly what fellini was trying to say.
(ooops, i just noticed i forgot to mention the above post was a fellini quote)

[toohot4pants]

i know i might sound like a tard but what does that mean ?

Federico Fellini, overrated piece of crap movie director...you know, like Kubrick...

[Late_vamp]

ok , wtv that was meant to mean .
whats up with all the director posting all of the sudden , it went from tits to women complaining to ppl saying what they like to directors ... try to keep it inside the subject or else it will get lost a bit too much .

[whaywardj]

Federico Fellini, overrated piece of crap movie director...you know, like Kubrick...

Ah. Spoken like a true airhead without a clue of film history.

[whaywardj]

ok , wtv that was meant to mean .
whats up with all the director posting all of the sudden , it went from tits to women complaining to ppl saying what they like to directors ... try to keep it inside the subject or else it will get lost a bit too much .

The very essence of the Fellini style!

[toohot4pants]

Ah. Spoken like a true airhead without a clue of film history.

they are completely overrated and revered by elitist thinkers who falsely believe their knowledge of film history makes them learned or sophisticated. bottom line, most of the movies of people like kubrick, fellini, et al. are not entertaining unless you take pains to understand it's place in history. i don't rent movies to learn...i'd rather be entertained. i'll stick to books and other print media, discussions, converstations, lectures, and other discourse for learning...and i'd rather understand and learn about more consequential or at least more subjectively interesting things than film history.

[Tone]

What are some titles of movies they've made?

[whaywardj]

they are completely overrated and revered by elitist thinkers who falsely believe their knowledge of film history makes them learned or sophisticated. bottom line, most of the movies of people like kubrick, fellini, et al. are not entertaining unless you take pains to understand it's place in history. i don't rent movies to learn...i'd rather be entertained. i'll stick to books and other print media, discussions, converstations, lectures, and other discourse for learning...and i'd rather understand and learn about more consequential or at least more subjectively interesting things than film history.

Arrogant little shit, aren't you?